G
GPACalc

UCL · 2026–27 numeric academic records

UCL Resit and Repeat Calculator

Trace second-attempt marks, retained components and the 60-credit route boundary.

Example record — replace with yours

Use final numeric marks, including any official caps. No student identifiers needed.

Record audit result

Checking example…

UCL 2026–27 standard numeric rules. Programme and Board decisions remain authoritative.

Calculation and rule trace

Record / ruleValueTreatment

Count first-failed taught credits for the route

The standard route is a Resit where first-failed taught credits in the session are 60 or fewer, and a Repeat where they exceed 60. Enter the total affected taught credits for the session, not only the credit size of the single module shown in the component rows. A deferred assessment without a confirmed first failure is not automatically a failed credit. This worksheet handles a numeric taught module under the ordinary route, not Board exceptions or a dissertation reassessment timetable.

Changing the session total from 60 to 61 changes the component treatment. A Resit reassesses only failed components and retains passed component marks. A Repeat reassesses every component of the failed module. The tool does not schedule examinations, calculate tuition charges or authorize a second attempt. Confirm the actual route and any exceptional permission with your department.

Check required components as well as the module mean

The example has an 80% component marked 70 and a 20% must-pass component marked 30. The numeric mean is 62.00, but the required component fails at level 4–6, so the module is not passed. Under a Resit, the passed 70 component is retained and a second mark of 55 on the failed component produces an uncapped module mean of 67.00.

A successful second-attempt numeric module is normally capped at the pass mark: 40.00 at levels 4–6 or 50.00 at level 7. The result shows the uncapped mean and the recorded module mark separately. Where a Resit is required only for a zero-weight pass/fail component, the module mark is not capped. Pass/fail components have to pass, but do not add numeric points or dilute the numeric weights.

A failed Resit differs from a failed Repeat

When a Resit fails, the higher of the two attempts is recorded for each affected component. The tool applies that comparison to component records, not a blanket maximum between two whole-module averages. Passed components stay retained. A failed Repeat instead uses the Repeat marks; it does not automatically restore higher first-attempt marks. Successful Repeat modules still follow the normal second-attempt cap.

A passed or already condoned module cannot be reassessed merely to improve its grade, so those records are rejected rather than advertised as grade-boosting opportunities. Extenuating circumstances, deferrals, substituted modules, professional restrictions, changed syllabuses and additional attempts require individual confirmation. Enter final component percentages after official conversion and any penalties; keep this output as a trace to compare with your record, not a replacement transcript.

Official sources

UCL 2026–27 regulations reviewed 7 October 2026. Use your programme information to confirm scope and exceptions.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is 60 failed taught credits a Repeat?
Under the ordinary route used here, 60 is a Resit; more than 60 is a Repeat.
Why can the recorded mark be lower than the calculated mean?
A successful second attempt normally records the module at the relevant pass-mark cap.
Can I resit a condoned module to raise its grade?
No. A passed or condoned module cannot be reassessed simply for grade improvement.

Related UCL record tools